By Kate Kelland
LONDON | Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:36am EDT
(Reuters) - Tobacco-related deaths have nearly tripled in the past decade and big tobacco firms are undermining public efforts that could save millions, a report led by the health campaign group the World Lung Foundation (WLF) said on Wednesday.
In the report, marking the tenth anniversary of its first Tobacco Atlas, the WLF and the American Cancer Society said if current trends continue, a billion people will die from tobacco use and exposure this century - one person every six seconds.
Tobacco has killed 50 million people in the last 10 years, and tobacco is responsible for more than 15 percent of all male deaths and 7 percent of female deaths, the new Tobacco Atlas report found. (www.tobaccoatlas.org)
In China, tobacco is already the number one killer - causing 1.2 million deaths a year - and that number is expected to rise to 3.5 million a year by 2030, the report said.
That is part of a broader shift, with smoking rates in the developed world declining but numbers growing in poorer regions, said Michael Eriksen, one of the report's authors and director of the Institute of Public Health at Georgia State University.
"If we don't act, the projections for the future are even more morbid. And the burden of death caused by tobacco is increasingly one of the developing world, particularly Asia, the Middle East and Africa," he said in an interview.
Almost 80 percent of people who die from tobacco-related illnesses now come from low- and middle-income countries. In Turkey, 38 percent of male deaths are from smoking-related illnesses, though smoking also remains the biggest killer of American women too.
WLF's chief executive Peter Baldini accused the tobacco industry of thriving on ignorance about the true effect of smoking and "misinformation to subvert health policies that could save millions".
The report said the industry had stepped up its fight against anti-tobacco policies, launching legal challenges and seeking to delay or stop the introduction of plain packaging, legislation banning smoking in public places, advertising bans and health warnings on packets.
The world's six biggest tobacco firms made $35.1 billion in profits in 2010 - equal to the combined earnings of Coca-Cola, Microsoft and McDonald's, the report said.
Smoking causes lung cancer as well as several other chronic pulmonary diseases and is a major risk factor in heart disease, the world's number one killer.
More than 170 countries have signed up to a World Health Organization-led convention committing them to cut smoking rates, limiting exposure to second-hand smoke, and curbing tobacco advertising and promotion.
WHO director general Margaret Chan said thanks in part to that convention, 1.1 billion people have in the past two years become covered by at least one measure designed to curb tobacco use. She added, however, that the battle was far from over and urged more countries to fight the industry.
"We must never allow the tobacco industry to get the upper hand," she said in a foreword to the report. "Tobacco is a killer. It should not be advertised, subsidized or glamorized."
(Reporting by Kate Kelland; Editing by Ben Harding)
Virtually no Sod LawnsYou are http://www.coachfactoryonline2012sale.com/ Coach Factory Online unable to merely spare liquid from certainly not irrigating any http://www.louisvuittonlcanadav.ca/ Louis Vuitton Canada property And it will save you an online great deal of liquid not to mention http://www.ukggboots.co.uk/ UGG UK conserve the habitat through getting eliminate your current playing surface sod.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Canada | 07 November 2012 at 01:12 AM
http://www.itiffanyandcooutlet.co.uk / Tiffany UK
http://www.itiffanyandcooutlet.co.uk / Tiffany and co outlet
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet0o.com / Michael Kors Outlet
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet0o.com / Michael Kors Handbags Outlet
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet0o.com / Michael Kors sale
Posted by: Tiffany and co outlet | 27 October 2012 at 04:18 AM
yDdzphZrtj isabel marant sneakers yGjptiHdos isabel marant boots nHwfgwOfqm isabel marant tennis shoes fIcsvtVplg http://isabellemarantboots.webgarden.com/ sPtojhXetv isabel marant sneakers iYxotfCmwp etoile isabel marant uCojprRkxg isabel marant wedges hJikhdYvpt http://isabellemarantssneakers.webs.com/#98388 lDlqzrMehn canada goose jackets pZkmziDmjp canada goose outlet zPjouxIetq canada goose banff parka kFqhxrNoch http://canadagoosejackets-outlets.webeden.net/#12734
Posted by: SwarbulaDub | 24 October 2012 at 02:10 PM
Bijtywibwyt My favored and when are tracks artwork with P.E. | Jordan Shoes Sale Cheers all about an infant rank on the subject off writing Jordan Shoes Sale ◥﹉ldegimcvbd
Posted by: Jordan Shoes Sale | 17 September 2012 at 06:04 PM
eIkjayOpnj fitflop fTwuwpUdwd fitflops wWggvtAtkf fitflop malaysia mIkghsTulm fitflops malaysia pYbdvjBjzg http://fitflopoutletmalaysia.com/
Posted by: estatryGype | 11 September 2012 at 07:30 PM
Current screening rticmmendaeoonsAt this time, no major professional organizations, including the American Cancer Society, recommend routine lung cancer screening, either for all people or for those at increased risk. However, as the results from the NLST are further analyzed, some organizations may update their rticmmendaeoons in the near future. In the meantime, some people who are at higher risk (and their doctors) may consider whether screening is appropriate for them.While a full cancer screening guideline is being developed, the American Cancer Society has created interim guidance for people and their doctors regarding the use of low-dose CT scans for the early detection of lung cancer:•People between the ages of 55 and 74 who meet the entry criteria of the NLST (see above) and are concerned about their risk of lung cancer may consider screening for lung cancer. With their doctor, people interested in screening should weigh the currently known benefits of screening with the currently known limits and risks in order to make a shared decision as to whether they should be screened for lung cancer.•Doctors may choose to discuss lung cancer screening with their patients who meet NLST entry criteria.•For people who do not meet the NLST entry criteria (because of younger age, smoking history, etc.), it is not clear if the possible benefits of screening outweigh the harms, so screening in these people is not recommended at this time. This is especially the case among people with no smoking history, in whom the possible harms are much more likely than benefits at this time. Whether people whose age or smoking history would have made them ineligible for the NLST should be screened will be addressed during the guidelines development process as more data becomes available.•People who choose to be screened should follow the NLST protocol for annual screening. This should be done in an organized screening program at an institution with expertise in spiral CT screening, with access to a multidisciplinary team skilled in finding and treating abnormal lung lesions. Referring doctors should help their patients find institutions with this expertise.•There is always benefit to quitting smoking. Active smokers entering a lung screening program should be urged to enter a smoking cessation program. Screening should not be viewed as an alternative to quitting smoking.•For people considering screening (and their doctors), some statistics from the NLST may be helpful. Of the nearly 26,000 people screened by low-dose CT in the NLST, 1,060 were diagnosed with lung cancer. Screening is estimated to have prevented 88 lung cancer deaths while causing 16 deaths. Six of the 16 deaths were in patients who ultimately were found not to have cancer.
Posted by: Ana | 06 July 2012 at 09:31 PM